This post was originally published on March 27, 2020.
If you’re frustrated at not being able to switch batteries in your older generation iPhone, or not being able to update your classic click-wheel iPod, we have some good news for you.
The European Union is planning to roll out sweeping measures that would require manufacturers to make it easier for you to upgrade and repair your devices on your own, instead of having to replace them with brand new phones and tablets.
The proposed measures are the latest in a series of policies the EU is implementing under its ambitious “Green Deal” which aims to reach zero carbon emissions by 2050.
What is the “right to repair”?
Put simply, the “right to repair” describes legislation born from public demands to repair their own devices.
This right gives consumers the prerogative to fix and upgrade their own devices without having to rely on an Apple Store or licensed retailer. As it stands right now, consumers can only resort to these official outlets or face the possibility of trashing their devices for a new one.
As the device repair wiki iFixit puts it, these demands include the right to:
- Fix our own things or choose which service shop to use
- Manuals and diagnostic tools the dealers use
- Unlock and jailbreak the software on our devices
If passed, these right to repair measures would generate less electronic waste, and increase the volume of devices that can be recycled—currently the EU recycles less than 40% of its electronics.
[Keep up with the latest in technology and security. Sign up for the ExpressVPN blog newsletter.]
In terms of tangible changes, the European commission would extend their eco-design law to cover electronic smart devices, smartphones, tablets and laptops, and set technical standards that would ensure all device parts are repairable.
This could include mandating a common device charger, like USB-C, which would make Apple’s lightning cables redundant. The EU has also introduced “right to repair” rules for home appliances to be in place by 2021.
Apple complains, claims standard-setting “stifles innovation”
Apple has made it incredibly difficult for users to get access to parts to fix their own devices. To its credit, Apple has started to slowly roll out a new program that grants independent repair shops access to Apple parts to help customers repair their devices.
But these measures have thrown a new spanner in the works for Apple’s Lightning charging cables, which Apple claims would “stifle innovation” if it had to conform to EU guidelines.
There is also the issue of ensuring that both software and hardware meet privacy and security standards on top of the standards that allow them to be repaired or recycled.
Try your hand at repairing some old tech
The rules are still being hammered out, but that doesn’t mean you can’t start dabbling in DIY fixes on your own devices. iFixit has a wealth of instructions on how to repair almost everything, from old iPods to game consoles and hundreds of other appliances. Maybe it’s time to get tinkering.
Comments
It’s not just the NSA it’s the local law enforcement and the sheriff and the citizens on patrol but thanks for saying something. I get followed everywhere I go. Simply put It’s a invasion of our privacy, harassment and stalking with no boundaries!. It should be illegal, I for one do not stand for it. My internet my personal phone, my work phone, my brand new laptop was hacked with in first couple days. My town is flooded with drones and fake cell phone TOWERS that intercept everyone’s cell service. The public hasn’t got a clue. Too much power in the wrong hands. I want them exposed!!!
I don’t buy Apple’s argument for a second. Organizations or individuals set on reverse engineering or breaking Apples privacy, security, and patented technologies are not interested in fixing the device while organizations or individuals who are interested in repairing the device are typically not interested in reverse engineering them. The overlap is very small with the majority of those who want to tinker with those aspects of the device being very aware of the consequences and undertaking the risks themselves. Thus, the stifles innovation argument is merit-less without further, highly substantial supporting arguments which would already have been presented if they existed and since they have not, these arguments can be considered irrelevant and merely a stalling action.